by Jim Paprocki and
David Larson
In
the absence of national leadership,
our legislators have a moral responsibility to provide equal rights for all
Iowans. The character of our state is in large part defined by our leaders'
willingness to ensure dignity and respect for all citizens.
The
Iowa Civil Rights Commission currently is unable to take action in response to
legitimate complaints of discrimination based on sexual orientation. The
Commission has recommended that the legislature expand the scope of Chapter 216
of the Code of Iowa to include protection from discrimination in connection
with employment, public accommodations, housing, credit
and education.
Some
maintain there is little evidence to support the need for protection based on
sexual orientation. This reasoning conveniently is dismissive of the need to
investigate whether discrimination exists in our state. We can best address the
adverse effects of discrimination after establishing a means to gather
documentation on these allegations.
The
Iowa Civil Rights Commission would provide a forum for people to seek relief
and enable our state to provide an environment free of hateful speech.
Commission members would be required to provide assistance to prevent and to
eliminate the harmful effects of discriminatory practices.
More than a
generation ago Americans took action to fight racial prejudice and to eliminate
hateful racist speech. Sixteen states maintained statutory prohibitions on
interracial marriages until the 1967 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Loving v
Dr. Martin
Luther King dreamed of an
Coretta Scott
King maintained her husband’s struggle parallels that of the gay rights
movement. "For many years now, I have been an outspoken supporter of civil and
human rights for gay and lesbian people," Mrs. King said at the
25th Anniversary Luncheon for the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund. "Gays and
lesbians stood up for civil rights in
The
2005 Iowa School Climate Survey reveals 83% of students reported being verbally
harassed and 34% reported some incident of physical harassment because of their
sexual orientation. When high school
students regularly endure taunts and hateful speech, it is necessary for adults
to object to their tormentors. We cannot simply dismiss these situations as
'typical adolescent behavior.' Surely even opponents must express outrage at
some children believing cruel treatment of others to be appropriate. We all should
be accorded the same respectful treatment we show our neighbors.
The Iowa Civil Rights Commission also
has supported passage of anti-bullying legislation to protect all students.
This legislation has been debated in the Iowa Assembly the past two years.
More
than 350 companies now extend benefits and workplace protections to employees
based upon sexual orientation. (These include John Deere, Maytag, Rockwell
Collins and the Principal Financial Group.) Anyone concerned about expanding
employment and industry in
Americans
have a long tradition of separation of church and state. We should not fail to
add sexual orientation to the Code of Iowa because some object to its inclusion
based on religious grounds. It is in the
common interest for everyone in our state to live with dignity and respect. The
proposed language does not require anyone to change their religious beliefs nor
does it interfere with the internal affairs of any church or religious
organization.
The
National Conference of Catholic Bishops, Episcopal Church, Evangelical Lutheran
Church, Presbyterian Church, United Church of Christ, United Methodist Church,
and Unitarian Universalist Association are only a few of the religious denominations
that endorse civil rights protection for gay, lesbian, bisexual and
transgendered citizens.
All Iowans who believe our state should
ensure justice and equality should insist the legislature support the Iowa Civil
Rights Commission’s recommendation to add sexual orientation to our civil
rights law.